Question 1: The article discusses that Paik's filming of the video was art because he was a recognized artist associated with experimental music and performance. What would the case had been if Paik had not been recognized for these? Would it have been possible to do what he did if he was the average videographer?
Question 2: The article says that Television benefited artists. If that is true then are artists benefitting from television more than tv networks? Or are tv networks benefitting more than the artists?
No comments:
Post a Comment